*29 Apr 2009 : Column 1285W*
Atomic Weapons Establishment
*Nick Harvey:* To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the
objectives are of the Threat Reduction Division at the Atomic Weapons
Establishment; and how many staff are employed in this division. [271266]
*Mr. Quentin Davies:* The Threat Reduction Division at the Atomic
Weapons Establishment (AWE) currently employs some 140 staff, drawing on
expertise as necessary from other parts of the AWE workforce to support
its tasking objectives. The Threat Reduction Division supports four
work-streams:
Nuclear Treaty Verification (including arms control verification
research and support to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
Organisation).
Nuclear Accident Response.
Counter Radiological and Nuclear Terrorism.
Nuclear Intelligence.
The detailed tasks and objectives within the four work-streams are being
withheld as their release would, or would be likely to, prejudice
national security.
Commons debate:
*29 Apr 2009 : Column 864
*
*Mr. Chris Mullin (Sunderland, South) (Lab):* Given that the Government
are a little strapped for cash at the moment, might this be the moment
to reconsider our commitment to spend £20 billion on a new generation of
nuclear weapons?
*The Prime Minister:* As my hon. Friend knows, that expenditure is over
more than 20 years. As he also knows, we wish to use the fact of our
deterrent to bring about non-proliferation of nuclear weapons throughout
the world and to persuade other countries to be part of a process of
nuclear disarmament. At the moment there is an opportunity for the major
powers to reduce their nuclear weapons and in return we could get
agreements about non-proliferation of nuclear weapons from some of the
major powers, while at the same time offering them the right that they
should have to civil nuclear power. He may remember that the
non-proliferation treaty was based on two principles: first, that
countries with nuclear weapons would cut their nuclear weapons, and
secondly, that we would give non-nuclear states access to civil nuclear
power. Given the pressures that exist at the moment, that is an even
more relevant position than it was 50 years ago.
.jpg)
