	<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nuclearinfo.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NIS Nuclear Information Service | home</title>
 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org</link>
 <description><div class='nav_infoheader'><div class='navinfoblockidL'><div class='home_iblock'></div></div><div class='navinfoblockidR'><div class='home_iblock'></div></div></div><div class='nav_infoinnercontent'>NIS (Nuclear Information Service) is a not-for-profit, independent information service, which works to promote public awareness and foster debate on nuclear disarmament and related safety and environmental issues.
<p/>
The NIS website is a place where you can access some of the information we hold. Here you will find information on what the government are doing with the Trident nuclear weapons system, nuclear convoys / warhead transport (Nukewatch) and regular updates on planning applications and safety issues at AWE (Atomic Weapons Establishment), as well as relevent Hansard entries and many other things.
<p/>
To subscribe to our mailing list click <a href="mailto:sympa@lists.riseup.net%3Fsubject=subscribe%20nis_updates"> here</a> and send.</div></description>
 <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>2010-03-12 17:00</pubDate><item>
		 <title>1400 objectors, 0 supporters: West Berkshire Council grants planning permission to AWE</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_sites/AWE_Aldermaston/a2047</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/PlanCtte2.jpg" width="497" height="371" /> 
</p>
<p>
Despite receiving over 1400 letters of objection, West Berkshire Council has decided to grant planning permission to the Atomic Weapons Establishment for a new Enriched Uranium Facility 
</p>
]]></description>
		 <pubDate>2010-02-10 23:42</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>NIS Update: January 2010</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/publications_%2526_media/NIS_updates/a2044</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>
Read all the latest news about developments in the UK's nuclear weapons programme and at the Atomic Weapons Establisment.  This month's NIS update contains stories about postponement of the Initial Gate for the project to replace Trident, the problems in the defence procrement programme highlighted by the Gray Review, and the long awaited report from the Scottish Government's 'Scotland Without Nuclear Weapons' working group - plus news about planning issues at AWE and new nuclear emergency planning arrangements.]]></description>
		 <pubDate>2010-01-28 20:09</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>61% say no to Pegasus development!</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_sites/AWE_Aldermaston/a2042</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[A street survey conducted by local environmental groups shows that a large majority of local people think that the proposed new Enriched Uranium Facility at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) Aldermaston should not be built.  Over 60% of those who were surveyed believed that the facility should not be built, with just 13% supporting the development.
]]></description>
		 <pubDate>2010-01-22 16:15</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Council accused of ‘sneaking through’ nuclear plans during Christmas rush</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_sites/AWE_Aldermaston/a2040</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[West Berkshire Council is allowing just three weeks for consultation on the controversial planning application for a new enriched uranium facility at AWE Aldermaston.
]]></description>
		 <pubDate>2009-12-06 21:14</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>AWE Aldermaston's £500 million new uranium project unnecessary and unaffordable</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_sites/AWE_Aldermaston/a2038</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[NIS considers the proposed new enriched uranium facility at AWE Aldermaston - for which a planning application has now been submitted to West Berkshire Council - to be unnecessary and unaffordable
and a potential obstacle to progress at forthcoming arms control talks.  Download our special briefing about AWE's enriched uranium facility and read previously unreleased Ministry of Defence investment appraisal documents for the project.
]]></description>
		 <pubDate>2009-11-30 10:30</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Government must consult openly on Plutonium management</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/policy/government/a2037</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>
The government must consult in an open and transparent manner on <br />
proposals for the long term management of plutonium says NIS in response <br />
to a consultation paper on options for the long term management of plutonium.
</p>
]]></description>
		 <pubDate>2009-11-29 15:47</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>New AWE Emergency Plan highlights chilling consequences of a nuclear accident</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_sites/accidents/a2035</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[Download NIS's special briefing on West Berkshire Council's new emergency plan for the Atomic Weapons Establishment and read about the full consequences of a major accident at one of Berkshire's nuclear weapons factories.
]]></description>
		 <pubDate>2009-11-23 08:17</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Emergency services could not cope with nuclear submarine accident</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/submarines/SCANS/a2033</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[An independent nuclear expert has cast doubt about the ability of
emergency services to cope with an accident involving a release of
radiation from one of the Royal Navy's nuclear powered submarines when
berthed in Southampton Docks.<br />
<br />
John Large, who headed the team assessing nuclear and radiation hazards during the salvage of the sunken Russian submarine <i>Kursk</i>,
told a public meeting organised by Southampton City Council that staff
from the Fire and Rescue Service, Ambulance Service, and Police would
be unable to deal with an emergency involving a nuclear submarine
without breaching limits for doses of radiation to individual
personnel.  <br />
<br />
“To the extend that their dose limitation system
permits their attendance firefighters will remain in attendance but
others, most probably the ambulance trust personnel, more than likely
police officers, and most certainly City Council employees will all
have to withdraw from the coutermeasures zone”, he said.
]]></description>
		 <pubDate>2009-11-05 22:42</pubDate>
		</item>
		</channel></rss>