	<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nuclearinfo.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NIS Nuclear Information Service | disarmament/issues</title>
 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org</link>
 <description><div class='nav_infoheader'><div class='navinfoblockidL'><div class='disarmament_iblock'></div></div><div class='navinfoblockidR'><div class='disarmament_iblock'></div></div></div><div class='nav_infoinnercontent'>All governments agree that nuclear disarmament will make the world a safer place. What is at issue is how and when it will be achieved. NIS informs the debate and reports on governmental, non-governmental and lobbying groups who seek to further disarmament. The terms of the Non-Proliferation Treaty are clear : that the nuclear states must disarm in return for the non-nuclear states’ commitment not to aquire nuclear weapons. But the nuclear states have consistently failed in their part of this bargain. International Humanitarian law is clear : noncombatant citizens have the right to life. The 1996 Judgment of the International Court of Justice also points unequivocally towards disarmament. Thousands of Peace and Justice groups around the world are clear that nuclear weapons do not add to personal, national or international security.

NIS is a link between nuclear disarmament research NGOs and grassroots and local groups. Citizen Verification and Citizens Inspections can inform national organisations and the wider public on disarmament progress or otherwise. Grassroots groups that publicise, educate and protest about nuclear weapons are part of the disarmament process. 
</div></description>
 <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>2012-02-08 03:26</pubDate><item>
		 <title>NIS videoblog: Making sense of the Strategic Defence and Security Review</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/disarmament/issues/a2102</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>
<object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,29,0" width="480" height="385">
	<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ByWegICnXas?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" />
	<param name="quality" value="high" />
	<param name="menu" value="false" />
	<param name="wmode" value="" />
	<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ByWegICnXas?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" wmode="" quality="high" menu="false" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385"></embed>
</object>
</p>
<p>
Our new video blog shows an interview with NIS Director Peter Burt about key recent government announcements on defence, nuclear weapons, and government spending: the Strategic Defence and Security Review; the National Security Strategy; and the Comprehensive Spending Review.
</p>
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Hansard on Nuclear Disarmament, 9th June 2008</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/disarmament/issues/a1900</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[*Mr. Dai Davies:* To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs with reference to the answer of 18 July 2007, /Official Report,/ column 409W, on nuclear disarmament, what progress has been made by the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston in taking forward proposals to develop a disarmament laboratory.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Droping the Bomb</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/disarmament/issues/a1890</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>
Do we need to worry about nuclear weapons any more? After the end of the Cold War, the world stepped back from the brink of mutually-assured annihilation and nuclear stockpiles were halved. But nukes haven't gone away. In fact, they are undergoing something of a renaissance. India, Pakistan and North Korea have all recently joined the nuclear club. The US, Russia, Britain, China and France are spending billions on 'modernizing' their nuclear arsenals. So why are disarmament campaigners so upbeat? The *NI* discovers a window of opportunity for banning the bomb – but can we seize the moment before the shutters slam down, perhaps for good?
</p>
<p>
Read the full article in the New Internationalist <a href="http://www.newint.org/features/2008/06/01/keynote/" title="The Bomb Stops Here" target="_blank">here</a>.
</p>
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Conference on 'Is Just War Possible?'</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/disarmament/issues/a1841</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>A Peace delegation attending this conference in March at Cumberland  Lodge in The Great Park, Windsor spoke against justifying war, but was glad of the opportunity to engage  with its advocates and an informed audience.</p>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>No surprise</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/disarmament/issues/a1831</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[Toady's news of a Unicef report showing UK children to be the most deprived
amongst 21 advanced countries has nuclear connections]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Trident replacement questions</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/disarmament/issues/a1832</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[Simple questions to ask those supporting nuclear weapons]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>No evidence that nuclear weapons deterred</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/disarmament/issues/a1833</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[Deterrence is a theory, not a weapon. Read a clear demolition of the deterrence argument.]]></description>
		</item>
		</channel></rss>
