	<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nuclearinfo.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NIS Nuclear Information Service | nuclear sites/planning</title>
 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org</link>
 <description><div class='nav_infoheader'><div class='navinfoblockidL'><div class='nuclear sitesplanning_iblock'></div></div><div class='navinfoblockidR'><div class='nuclear sitesplanning_iblock'></div></div></div><div class='nav_infoinnercontent'>As a public service, NIS monitors and reports on non-sensitive developments at and about British nuclear weapons production related sites.
<p/>
NIS publishes material relating to the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) Aldermaston and Burghfield sites, located in the southern English County of West Berkshire. Since the 1950s, AWE is where the design, production, assembly, maintenance, disassembly and decommissioning of nuclear weapons takes place. Between 2004 and 2015, building developments are underway to enable a new generation of warheads to be researched and designed without underground nuclear testing. See monthly NIS Updates on the new developments at AWE.
<p/>
Other nuclear weapons related sites include the Clyde facilties at RNAD Coulport and the Naval Base Faslane; RRMPOL Derby and DML Devonport. All these sites creat nuclear discharges and waste.</div></description>
 <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>2012-02-08 12:15</pubDate><item>
		 <title>AWE Burghfield planning permission conditional on HSE approval</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+sites/planning/a2133</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[West Berkshire Council's Eastern Area Planning Committee has agreed to renew planning permission for a <a href="/view/nuclear_sites/AWE_Burghfield/a2125">Conventional Manufacturing Facility</a> at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) Burghfield – but only on condition that the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) confirms that it has no objections to the development on nuclear safety grounds in the light of the Fukushima nuclear accident.
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>AWE Burghfield planning application resubmitted</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+sites/planning/a2125</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[The Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) has submitted a <a href="http://publicaccess.westberks.gov.uk/PublicAccess/tdc/DcApplication/application_detailview.aspx?caseno=LF9U2KRD08D00">planning application</a>
to West Berkshire Council to extend the time limit for construction of
a new conventional manufacturing rationalisation (CMR) facility at AWE
Burghfield. <br />
<br />
Planning permission for the facility was <a href="http://publicaccess.westberks.gov.uk/PublicAccess/tdc/DcApplication/application_detailview.aspx?caseno=K19PO4RD04Z00">originally granted</a>
in August 2008, with building work scheduled to commence within three
years.  AWE has stated that construction of the new facility has not
yet commenced because resources have had to be directed towards higher
priority projects, and so a new application has been submitted to
extend the time limit before planning permission expires.
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Public inquiry into AWE safety extended by four days</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+sites/planning/a2100</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[The Boundary Hall planning inquiry into
development in the emergency planning zone at the Atomic Weapons
Establishment (AWE) Aldermaston is to be extended by four days to
allow evidence into public safety to be fully examined.
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Investment spending at AWE rockets to £1 billion per year</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+sites/planning/a2026</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[A low-key parliamentary statement has announced that investment spending at the Atomic Weapons Establishment will increase to an average of £1 billion per year between now and 2013.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>WBC Report MENSA</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+sites/planning/a1992</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<b>AWE Burghfield Planning Application for a Dis/Assembly facility to be decided.</b> WBC Planning Committee Meeting 6.30pm Wednesday 4th March 2009, Council Offices, Market Street, Newbury, Berks.<p/>see <a href = "">Planning Officer's Report</a>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>1000 comments on new Nuclear warhead facility</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+sites/planning/a1988</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[Some 1,000 comments have been lodged over a plan to modernise a nuclear warhead facility in Berkshire. Many people raised concerns over flooding at the proposed new facility at the Aldermaston Atomic Weapons Establishment.
<p/>
BBC 20th Feb 2009
<p/>
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/7901361.stm" title="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/7901361.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/7901361.stm</a>]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Objection to MoD Planning Application: 08/02287/COMIND</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+sites/planning/a1987</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[The requirement for AWE to improve the safety of its warhead disassembly bunkers is not disputed. In 2007 NIS published ‘How Safe is AWE Burghfield?’ a report based on FoI disclosures documenting the safety failures of the existing ‘Gravel Gertie’ (GG) facilities and addressing the dilemma in which the MoD found itself. In 2006 and 2007 the HSE Nuclear Inspectorate (NI) pressed AWE to close the facility until essential safety improvements could be carried out. The MoD refused on ‘national security‘ grounds. Eventually the NI secured an agreement that warhead work would only be carried out under a single-operation permissioning regime, which continues today. This emergency arrangement ensures that no work is done by AWE before the NI have inspected the buildings on each occasion permission is requested.
]]></description>
		</item>
		</channel></rss>
