	<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nuclearinfo.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NIS Nuclear Information Service | nuclear weapons/development</title>
 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org</link>
 <description><div class='nav_infoheader'><div class='navinfoblockidL'><div class='nuclear weapons_iblock'></div></div><div class='navinfoblockidR'><div class='nuclear weapons_iblock'></div></div></div><div class='nav_infoinnercontent'>This section contains information about Britain's Trident nuclear weapon system; the development of a replacement system; military nuclear waste; nuclear materials transport; warhead transport and Nukewatch (UK), the citizen verification national transport monitoring network.

NIS provides data analysis of these movements based on Nukewatch information You can use the navigation links to the right to find information about both types of military nuclear transports, and about the monitoring network Nukewatch (UK), that works to highlight such movements and to raise concerns with both the public and decision-makers about safety and security issues.
</div></description>
 <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>2009-01-07 09:09</pubDate><item>
		 <title>£2bn bonus for US corporations if government goes ahead with Trident replacement</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+weapons/development/a1938</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[There is a hidden bonus of over £2bn to US corporations if the 
government goes ahead with building new nuclear warheads <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul/25/nuclear.weaponstechnology" class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/<br />
jul/25/nuclear.weaponstechnology</a>
<br />
<br />
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Planning approval for new nuclear warhead 'conventional components' facility expected in 13th Aug 08</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+weapons/development/a1935</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>
AWE expects Planning Approval for a new nuclear warhead conventional 
components facility on Wednesday 13th August 2008.
</p>
<p>
Building plans for another warhead production facility at AWE 
Aldermaston are expected to be approved by West Berkshire Council 
Planning on Wednesday 13th August. (See <a href="/view/publications_%2526_media/NIS_updates/a1923">NIS Update July 2008</a>. Public denials of government preparations to 
develop and manufacture a replacement for the current Trident W76 
warhead have lacked credibility since the AWE Aldermaston Site 
Development Plan was published in 2002
</p>
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Trident warhead replacement confirmed</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+weapons/development/a1939</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[The Guardian reports that David Gould, former chief operating officer at 
the Defence Equipment and Support Organisation, stated in June 2007 that 
AWE would build a new Trident warhead. At a defence industry conference 
Mr Gould said: &quot;The intention is to replace the entire Vanguard class 
submarine system. Including the warhead and missile.&quot; The MoD continues 
to deny that the government has taken the decision to build a new 
warhead, despite the eight-year building project to modernise the 
warhead manufacturing facility at AWE Aldermaston and Burghfield.
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jYnTLA2O1_zZeCJRPEMNLGYcqCAA" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jYnTLA2O1_zZeCJRPEMNLGYcqCAA</a> 
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Counting the cost of the UK's next nuclear deterrent</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+weapons/development/a677</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[It wasn&#8217;t quite a throwback to the Cold War era of rowdy Commons debates and campaigners chained to the gates of Greenham Common. But last week&#8217;s rebellion over the UK&#8217;s nuclear arsenal was still sizeable. It also drew a major parallel with the past: ministers, officials and the public have little idea how much the controversial nuclear deterrent will cost]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Nuclear Weapons Facilities</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+weapons/development/a1869</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[*Dr. Julian Lewis:* To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on recent discussions with Kellogg Brown and Root about future investment in Devonport Dockyard. 
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Revealed: UK develops secret nuclear warhead</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+weapons/development/a678</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[The Sunday Times of 12 March carried substantial articles and comment on the future of Britain's nuclear weapons programme]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>The future of Britain's WMD</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear+weapons/development/a679</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[Report prepared by Dan Plesch for the Foreign Policy Centre. Published March 2006]]></description>
		</item>
		</channel></rss>