	<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nuclearinfo.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NIS Nuclear Information Service | nuclear weapons/waste</title>
 <link>http://nuclearinfo.org</link>
 <description><div class='nav_infoheader'><div class='navinfoblockidL'><div class='nuclear_weapons_iblock'></div></div><div class='navinfoblockidR'><div class='nuclear_weapons_iblock'></div></div></div><div class='nav_infoinnercontent'>This section contains information about Britain's Trident nuclear weapon system; the development of a replacement system; military nuclear waste; nuclear materials transport; warhead transport and Nukewatch (UK), the citizen verification national transport monitoring network.

NIS provides data analysis of these movements based on Nukewatch information You can use the navigation links to the right to find information about both types of military nuclear transports, and about the monitoring network Nukewatch (UK), that works to highlight such movements and to raise concerns with both the public and decision-makers about safety and security issues.
</div></description>
 <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>2012-02-08 04:11</pubDate><item>
		 <title>Radioactive waste treatment facility at AWE Aldermaston two years behind schedule</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/waste/a2117</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/y-12_waste.jpg" width="512" height="341" /> 
</p>
<p>
A key facility for the treatment of radioactive waste from the production of nuclear weapons at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE) at Aldermaston is two years behind schedule, and the Health and Safety Executive's Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII) has resorted to imposing 'special measures' reporting on AWE in an attempt to force the establishment to deliver the project on time.<br />
<br />
Correspondence between AWE and the NII, released to the Nuclear Information Service under the Freedom of Information Act, reveals that NII does “not have confidence that the project will be delivered to time”, and has ordered AWE to provide monthly written updates on progress with the project.
</p>
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Isolus Options</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/waste/a1743</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[Interim Storage of  Laid Up Submarines (ISOLUS) will be subject to a 2nd Public Consultation at the end of 2009.
The nuclear reactor compartments (RCs) and contaminated pipework
has to be stored until a long-term storage facility for nuclear waste is established. NIS has taken a sideways look at the options regarding the CUT UP of RCs for boxed storage and CUT OUT of RCs to be stored as a whole submarine section. The 1st consultation and
current NGO policy is to support Cut Out]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Military Nuclear Waste Locations in the UK</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/waste/a1744</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[larger versions available on request<br />
<img src="/gfx/images/UK_map_waste.jpg" title="UK_map_waste_sml.jpg" border="0" width="212" />
]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>3bn to clean up MoD nuclear sites</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/waste/a1745</link>
		 <description><![CDATA["Genuine action to clean up radioactive contamination is good news for areas currently blighted by the MoD's nuclear programme, but yet more bad news for the taxpayer," - Stuart Hay, Friends of the Earth Scotland]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>MILITARY NUCLEAR WASTE</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/waste/a1746</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[Article about Military Nuclear Waste storage. Includes information about storage locations and waste classification.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>New Scientist reports on new data on DU Dangers.</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/waste/a1747</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[Although the Governments denies it, many people have long suspected that depleted uranium weapons may cause
cancer. It looks as if the suspicions were right.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		 <title>Hansard on Trident, Submarines and Waste, January 2007</title>
		 <link>http://www.nuclearinfo.org/view/nuclear_weapons/waste/a1860</link>
		 <description><![CDATA[*Lynne Jones:* To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what his estimate is of the time it would take to procure further Trident D5 missiles.
]]></description>
		</item>
		</channel></rss>
