2013 This report examines the “damage criteria” used by the MOD in planning the UK’s nuclear weapons programme and more recent replacements, and how a desire for particular weapons systems has reshaped the amount of damage considered acceptable. By John Ainslie Download if the embedded viewer has a problem
Unacceptable Damage
If Britain Fired Trident
2013 A study of the humanitarian consequences of a nuclear attack by one Trident submarine on likely primary targets in and around Moscow. By John Ainslie Download if the embedded viewer has a problem
-
Categories:
- Ainslie Archive
Times, ‘Who will see off the Spetsnaz.’
18 September 1985.
New Statesman, ‘Zircon Why MPs didn’t want to know.’
11 December 1987.
Daily Express, Ian Mather, ‘Dad’s Army set to stamp out Kremlin’s moles.’
08 September 1985.
Observer, ‘Reagan’s men raid Russia.’
30 August 1987.
John Ainslie notes, Boris Yeltsin Baltic states, targets for Trident
no date
Daily Mirror, Mark Dowdney, The Great Nuclear Escape
25 March 1994
Daily Record, A necessary nuclear evil
no date
Daily Record, Gary Jones, US hears sounds of sub breaking apart
18 August 2000
Pravda, ‘The Pentagon is developing a new weapon to obtain absolute predominance.’
30 May 2006.
Neptune papers, Nuclear warships and naval nuclear weapons, William Arkin
May 1988