2013 This report examines the “damage criteria” used by the MOD in planning the UK’s nuclear weapons programme and more recent replacements, and how a desire for particular weapons systems has reshaped the amount of damage considered acceptable. By John Ainslie Download if the embedded viewer has a problem
Unacceptable Damage
UK MOD, ‘Top Secret: Criteria for Deterrence III.’
06 February 1978.
UK MOD, ‘Top Secret: Criteria for Deterrence II.’
20 January 1978.
UK MOD, ‘Successor SSBN, Safety regulator’s advice propulsion plant.’
04 November 2009.
AWE, ‘Warhead assurance under CTBT constraints.’
21 September 2010.
UK MOD, ‘Deterrent Governance, Successor submarine project.’
25 November 2009.
‘Uncharted Waters, UK SSBN base location.’
No date.
‘Yucca flat shots, Pahute mesa.’
No date.
Ivo Daalder, ‘Miller consults with allies on nuclear posture review.’
04 September 2009.
-
Categories:
- Ainslie Archive Box 7
- NATO
- Nuclear posture
- US – UK co-operation
UK MOD, ‘FOI Internal Review, Future deterrent.’
28 February 2011.
British Journal of Radiology, ‘The radiological effects of nuclear war.’
March 1983.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. More information
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.